B3BENCH3 · LOCAL VS CLOUD
August 2026 · 16 tasks · 6 categories
Local LLMs step into the arena —
and hold their own.
MTPLX — a free, open-source Mac app running Qwen 3.8 27B on a single laptop —
vs four cloud frontier models, measured on the identical bench3 harness with blind hidden-test
grading.
75%
Task pass rate · 12/16 · trial 1
$0.00
Marginal cost · 100% local
4.24/5
Judged output quality · blind rubric
1.7×
MTP decode speedup · up to 2.6×
Task pass rate
DeepSeek V4 Flash76% · 38/50
DeepSeek V4 Pro80% · 40/50
MTPLX · Qwen 3.8 27B75% · 12/16
GLM 5.2 Vision · LunaRoute81% · 13/16
Cloud arms: 3–5 trials (n=50) · MTPLX & GLM: trial 1 (n=16)
Cost · speed · quality
API spend per passing task
MTPLX runs on your own hardware — $0 forever. GLM pricing not published at run time.
Effective tokens/sec (single-shot)
Cloud = vendor GPUs · MTPLX = laptop decode, MTP on
MTP speculative decoding — why the laptop is fast
22–30
tok/s · MTP on (depth 3)
drafts with its own MTP heads, verifies in one batched pass
→
13–18
tok/s · plain decoding
identical output distribution — exact at any temperature
Thermals beat samplers: the same 9,000-token prompt decodes at 36–46 tok/s on a cool Mac
(46.4 in the MTPLX app dashboard), but throttles to ~26 after hours of sustained load.
Community follow-up: the Qwen MLX challenge (2.94×)
We reproduced it on this M5 Max
True serial (MTP off)11.2 tok/s
MTP depth 8 · record submission23.3 tok/s
2.07× · exact output parity (all tokens bit-identical)
The ladder
Our box · record submission2.07×
Leaderboard record · gated M5 Max2.94×
gated = ≤40°C, idle, 8 hidden prompts × 512 tok · yukon.org/mlxfast
Verdict: confirmed. Same chip as our bench (M5 Max, 64 GB): native MTP decode
11.2 → 23.3 tok/s with exact parity; the 2.94× record reflects the leaderboard's thermally gated conditions.
MTPLX on the same hardware: 1.6–2.6×.
Hardware & setup
Machine
MacBook Pro · M5 Max
Runtime
MTPLX 2.7.1 · MLX · turbo · depth 3
Model
Qwen 3.8 27B Optimized Speed
Weights
20.4 GB · 4-bit dynamic quant
Peak memory
~22.4 GB of 64 GB
License
Apache-2.0 · open source
Where it lands
Reasoning
4/4 tasks ✓
Solved the two hardest puzzles (r1_tiling, r4_catalan) that both DeepSeek arms missed — GPT/Grok territory.
Tool use
0/3 tasks ✗
Refused on t3 ("I can't make tool calls") — a real interaction gap vs DeepSeek/Grok.
Agentic speed
4/5 ✓ · 10–23× slower
Passed coding/workflow tasks, but agent loops took 2–23 min vs 0.5–4 min on cloud GPUs.